TBD on Ning
Obama: America's Gift To Terrorists
For al Qaeda and other terrorists across the globe, Obama is the gift that just keeps on giving. The fanatical Muslim terrorists who are intent on wiping out every man woman and child that doesn't accept Allah as God was just handed another victory by the President of the United States.
In response to yet another threat from the al Qaeda faction in Yemen responsible for training the panty bomber who tried to take out a U.S. bound jet on Christmas day, the Obama administration decided to close down our embassy in Yemen. "The U.S. Embassy in San'a is closed today, January 3, 2010, in response to ongoing threats by al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula ... to attack American interests in Yemen," the embassy said in a message on its Web site.
Obama's counter-terrorism expert also informed the nation on Sunday that the United States would not be opening up a new front in Yemen to battle the increasing presence of al Qaeda there. This mirrors the Obama administration's response to ever increasing threats from terrorist murderers: if we just ignore them, maybe they'll go away.
President Obama has made it official. Faced with murderous threats from fanatical Muslims, America will cut and run. Al Qaeda and assorted terrorists the world over are rejoicing. Yet again.
These barbaric animals are laughing out loud at the policies President Obama and his buddies have enacted since he became president of the greatest country in the world.
First, Obama did what Democrats do when faced with an uncomfortable reality. They redefine it. Obama abolished the war on terror with a stroke of the pen. Presto, we now have man-made catastrophic events, not to be confused with the bogus global warming catastrophic events.
This was followed by the left's favorite response to any crisis not of their own making: dialogue. Despite the fact that 'reaching out' is considered a distinct sign of weakness by our enemies and has never worked, Obama scored political points by convincing half the nation that he could effect world peace through the sheer force of his personality. Obama's dialogue did accomplish something, however. It allowed him to appear to be doing something, when in actuality he was merely avoiding the hard decisions associated with real leadership.
This man of action then handed terrorists legitimacy, along with all the legal rights American citizens have fought and died for. Enemy combatants, for the first time in history, will be tried in civilian courts in New York. In the same neighborhood they demolished on 9/11. How cool is that, terrorists say.
This insane policy does have a silver lining. It just might encourage terrorists in Yemen and Afghanistan to surrender. That way they can leave the blood and guts battlefield and wage jihad from the worldwide platform being afforded (courtesy of U.S. taxpayers) by a New York courtroom. Again, courtesy of Obama. Who knows, terrorists might just be able to accomplish more effective jihad from within America. Just think of the recruitment opportunities in American jails. Yahoo!
Then again, these animals may just opt to stay on the battlefield overseas. After all, Obama's new rules of engagement have severely hampered U.S. fighting men. All al Qaeda has to do is hide behind women and children and they get a virtual free pass. And if by chance they get caught killing Americans and they aren't mirandized, well, its off to Gitmo, where they'll have a chance to rest up and regroup. Once they gain 20 pounds or so, they'll be shipped back home where they pick up right where they left off.
Unless, of course, Obama is successful in closing Gitmo, in which case the terrorists will have to make do with 3 squares and cable TV from Chicago until they get shipped home to the same old goat meat and drafty caves.
No wonder our enemies are laughing. As the Taliban indoctrinate kids as young as five years-old into being killing machines, Obama focuses his efforts on sanitizing and avoiding a fight to the finish that our enemies wage as a war and Obama wages as an exercise in rhetoric.
As the left steps up their efforts to sensitize males, our enemies breed warriors and come ever closer to obtaining the technology and materials needed for a nuclear weapon. America will then have no choice but to follow Obama's policy of appeasement. And the terrorists will have won. And America will be no more.
If you're not scared yet, let me offer you this visual exercise: Imagine Obama and his buddies coming face to face with a coven of jihadists. Which side is going to win? Obama's words or the terrorist's sword?
Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina
In response to yet another threat from the al Qaeda faction in Yemen responsible for training the panty bomber who tried to take out a U.S. bound jet on Christmas day, the Obama administration decided to close down our embassy in Yemen. "The U.S. Embassy in San'a is closed today, January 3, 2010, in response to ongoing threats by al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula ... to attack American interests in Yemen," the embassy said in a message on its Web site.
Obama's counter-terrorism expert also informed the nation on Sunday that the United States would not be opening up a new front in Yemen to battle the increasing presence of al Qaeda there. This mirrors the Obama administration's response to ever increasing threats from terrorist murderers: if we just ignore them, maybe they'll go away.
President Obama has made it official. Faced with murderous threats from fanatical Muslims, America will cut and run. Al Qaeda and assorted terrorists the world over are rejoicing. Yet again.
These barbaric animals are laughing out loud at the policies President Obama and his buddies have enacted since he became president of the greatest country in the world.
First, Obama did what Democrats do when faced with an uncomfortable reality. They redefine it. Obama abolished the war on terror with a stroke of the pen. Presto, we now have man-made catastrophic events, not to be confused with the bogus global warming catastrophic events.
This was followed by the left's favorite response to any crisis not of their own making: dialogue. Despite the fact that 'reaching out' is considered a distinct sign of weakness by our enemies and has never worked, Obama scored political points by convincing half the nation that he could effect world peace through the sheer force of his personality. Obama's dialogue did accomplish something, however. It allowed him to appear to be doing something, when in actuality he was merely avoiding the hard decisions associated with real leadership.
This man of action then handed terrorists legitimacy, along with all the legal rights American citizens have fought and died for. Enemy combatants, for the first time in history, will be tried in civilian courts in New York. In the same neighborhood they demolished on 9/11. How cool is that, terrorists say.
This insane policy does have a silver lining. It just might encourage terrorists in Yemen and Afghanistan to surrender. That way they can leave the blood and guts battlefield and wage jihad from the worldwide platform being afforded (courtesy of U.S. taxpayers) by a New York courtroom. Again, courtesy of Obama. Who knows, terrorists might just be able to accomplish more effective jihad from within America. Just think of the recruitment opportunities in American jails. Yahoo!
Then again, these animals may just opt to stay on the battlefield overseas. After all, Obama's new rules of engagement have severely hampered U.S. fighting men. All al Qaeda has to do is hide behind women and children and they get a virtual free pass. And if by chance they get caught killing Americans and they aren't mirandized, well, its off to Gitmo, where they'll have a chance to rest up and regroup. Once they gain 20 pounds or so, they'll be shipped back home where they pick up right where they left off.
Unless, of course, Obama is successful in closing Gitmo, in which case the terrorists will have to make do with 3 squares and cable TV from Chicago until they get shipped home to the same old goat meat and drafty caves.
No wonder our enemies are laughing. As the Taliban indoctrinate kids as young as five years-old into being killing machines, Obama focuses his efforts on sanitizing and avoiding a fight to the finish that our enemies wage as a war and Obama wages as an exercise in rhetoric.
As the left steps up their efforts to sensitize males, our enemies breed warriors and come ever closer to obtaining the technology and materials needed for a nuclear weapon. America will then have no choice but to follow Obama's policy of appeasement. And the terrorists will have won. And America will be no more.
If you're not scared yet, let me offer you this visual exercise: Imagine Obama and his buddies coming face to face with a coven of jihadists. Which side is going to win? Obama's words or the terrorist's sword?
Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina
Tags: Obama, on, surrender, terror, war
Views: 77
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Nancy Morgan on
-
Hey Funes - specifics please
-
Permalink Reply by Tina on
-
You rock, Funes and in my humble opinion so does our Presidents efforts to create the opportunity for changes not only in this failing country but world wide. Although I make no public claim of belonging to any American political party I do believe on every level in world peace.
I do not believe that any one President is responsible for the building up or the ruin of this country or world. I believe it is on the back of "the people" and surely there are many in America that do not support peace. All one needs to do is to read the shared words on these posts, different places and all around. Hate, anger, war, killing, even murder for some is all acceptable, EXCEPT, when it is against American citizens. My thought's on this? Hogwash!
Every life, in every country is created with intent and purpose, all life is of value and should be treated accordingly.
I have a poster on my page and I fully support it's words, it states simply this. "I am already against the next war".
Do I think that the world is on a spiral downhill swing? Yes I do, but not because of one man who was educated, strong and man enough to offer his widoms to created the opportunity for change, I bless President Obama for that. As to the people who refuse to come together to help heal the world and just keep the private little wars fueled and firing so that we are distracted from needed changes and healing from war, well I think their words and actions speak quite well for themselves.
-
Permalink Reply by Mother Sanity (JackieRodzinski) on
-
Well, youre response is eloquent and intelligent.
You are always welcome to kill our dog.
-
Permalink Reply by Slayer Dug on
-
Diplomacy didn't stop Hitler.
-
Permalink Reply by P.A. on
-
Bad diplomacy created Hitler. Had good diplomacy been used after The Great War Hitler would never have been anything but a house painter.
-
-
And how was it that Hitler died again?
Here allow me:Death of Adolf Hitler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is semi-protected due to vandalism.
Cover of US armed forces newspaper The Stars and Stripes, 2 May 1945.
The generally accepted cause of the death of Adolf Hitler on 30 April 1945 is suicide by gunshot[1] and cyanide poisoning. The lack of public information concerning the whereabouts of Hitler's remains, confused reports stemming from the dual method and other circumstances surrounding the event encouraged rumours that Hitler may have survived the end of World War II. Records kept by the Soviet KGB and Russian FSB were opened in 1992 and mostly matched the widely accepted version of Hitler's death as described by Hugh Trevor-Roper in his book The Last Days of Hitler published in 1947.[2] However, the Russian archives yielded more detailed autopsy information along with what happened to the corpse.
-
-
TSD post that diplomacy did not stop Hitler, I wanted to point out that war did not either, that he killed himself.
-
-
But my dog is STILL alive....
-
-
Animak,
The first comment I agree with wholeheartedly. Personally, I think its a shame. Reasonable people used to enjoy debate and actually learn from other viewpoints. The state of debate, as evidenced by the forum, however, has degenerated into mindless name calling. We all lose that way.
I challenge anyone to present a cogent fact based argument to my article, with no adjectives. Its a serious issue and deserves to be taken seriously.
-
-
Why don't we just open our borders to everybody that hates America and have a great big counseling session, complete with milk, cookies, candy and Kool-Aid?!!!? That way when all grievances are aired, we can form a committee to discuss how we are going to deal with these problems. Then we can form a committee to finance our obligations and then form a committee to appoint a committee to carry out these initiatives. Then everybody will want to hold hands, buy the world a Coke, and we can all sing CUMBAYAH, and live happily ever after.....
-
Permalink Reply by Westerly_2 on
-
"Cumbaya"? "Hand-holding"? Really? Flashing back, much? Funny the entrenched (to say nothing of outdated) misconceptions some people continue to embrace. And those odd thick lenses with which they view their political oponents.... Just plain silly.
© 2024 Created by Aggie.
Powered by
