TBD on Ning
Obama: America's Gift To Terrorists
For al Qaeda and other terrorists across the globe, Obama is the gift that just keeps on giving. The fanatical Muslim terrorists who are intent on wiping out every man woman and child that doesn't accept Allah as God was just handed another victory by the President of the United States.
In response to yet another threat from the al Qaeda faction in Yemen responsible for training the panty bomber who tried to take out a U.S. bound jet on Christmas day, the Obama administration decided to close down our embassy in Yemen. "The U.S. Embassy in San'a is closed today, January 3, 2010, in response to ongoing threats by al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula ... to attack American interests in Yemen," the embassy said in a message on its Web site.
Obama's counter-terrorism expert also informed the nation on Sunday that the United States would not be opening up a new front in Yemen to battle the increasing presence of al Qaeda there. This mirrors the Obama administration's response to ever increasing threats from terrorist murderers: if we just ignore them, maybe they'll go away.
President Obama has made it official. Faced with murderous threats from fanatical Muslims, America will cut and run. Al Qaeda and assorted terrorists the world over are rejoicing. Yet again.
These barbaric animals are laughing out loud at the policies President Obama and his buddies have enacted since he became president of the greatest country in the world.
First, Obama did what Democrats do when faced with an uncomfortable reality. They redefine it. Obama abolished the war on terror with a stroke of the pen. Presto, we now have man-made catastrophic events, not to be confused with the bogus global warming catastrophic events.
This was followed by the left's favorite response to any crisis not of their own making: dialogue. Despite the fact that 'reaching out' is considered a distinct sign of weakness by our enemies and has never worked, Obama scored political points by convincing half the nation that he could effect world peace through the sheer force of his personality. Obama's dialogue did accomplish something, however. It allowed him to appear to be doing something, when in actuality he was merely avoiding the hard decisions associated with real leadership.
This man of action then handed terrorists legitimacy, along with all the legal rights American citizens have fought and died for. Enemy combatants, for the first time in history, will be tried in civilian courts in New York. In the same neighborhood they demolished on 9/11. How cool is that, terrorists say.
This insane policy does have a silver lining. It just might encourage terrorists in Yemen and Afghanistan to surrender. That way they can leave the blood and guts battlefield and wage jihad from the worldwide platform being afforded (courtesy of U.S. taxpayers) by a New York courtroom. Again, courtesy of Obama. Who knows, terrorists might just be able to accomplish more effective jihad from within America. Just think of the recruitment opportunities in American jails. Yahoo!
Then again, these animals may just opt to stay on the battlefield overseas. After all, Obama's new rules of engagement have severely hampered U.S. fighting men. All al Qaeda has to do is hide behind women and children and they get a virtual free pass. And if by chance they get caught killing Americans and they aren't mirandized, well, its off to Gitmo, where they'll have a chance to rest up and regroup. Once they gain 20 pounds or so, they'll be shipped back home where they pick up right where they left off.
Unless, of course, Obama is successful in closing Gitmo, in which case the terrorists will have to make do with 3 squares and cable TV from Chicago until they get shipped home to the same old goat meat and drafty caves.
No wonder our enemies are laughing. As the Taliban indoctrinate kids as young as five years-old into being killing machines, Obama focuses his efforts on sanitizing and avoiding a fight to the finish that our enemies wage as a war and Obama wages as an exercise in rhetoric.
As the left steps up their efforts to sensitize males, our enemies breed warriors and come ever closer to obtaining the technology and materials needed for a nuclear weapon. America will then have no choice but to follow Obama's policy of appeasement. And the terrorists will have won. And America will be no more.
If you're not scared yet, let me offer you this visual exercise: Imagine Obama and his buddies coming face to face with a coven of jihadists. Which side is going to win? Obama's words or the terrorist's sword?
Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina
In response to yet another threat from the al Qaeda faction in Yemen responsible for training the panty bomber who tried to take out a U.S. bound jet on Christmas day, the Obama administration decided to close down our embassy in Yemen. "The U.S. Embassy in San'a is closed today, January 3, 2010, in response to ongoing threats by al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula ... to attack American interests in Yemen," the embassy said in a message on its Web site.
Obama's counter-terrorism expert also informed the nation on Sunday that the United States would not be opening up a new front in Yemen to battle the increasing presence of al Qaeda there. This mirrors the Obama administration's response to ever increasing threats from terrorist murderers: if we just ignore them, maybe they'll go away.
President Obama has made it official. Faced with murderous threats from fanatical Muslims, America will cut and run. Al Qaeda and assorted terrorists the world over are rejoicing. Yet again.
These barbaric animals are laughing out loud at the policies President Obama and his buddies have enacted since he became president of the greatest country in the world.
First, Obama did what Democrats do when faced with an uncomfortable reality. They redefine it. Obama abolished the war on terror with a stroke of the pen. Presto, we now have man-made catastrophic events, not to be confused with the bogus global warming catastrophic events.
This was followed by the left's favorite response to any crisis not of their own making: dialogue. Despite the fact that 'reaching out' is considered a distinct sign of weakness by our enemies and has never worked, Obama scored political points by convincing half the nation that he could effect world peace through the sheer force of his personality. Obama's dialogue did accomplish something, however. It allowed him to appear to be doing something, when in actuality he was merely avoiding the hard decisions associated with real leadership.
This man of action then handed terrorists legitimacy, along with all the legal rights American citizens have fought and died for. Enemy combatants, for the first time in history, will be tried in civilian courts in New York. In the same neighborhood they demolished on 9/11. How cool is that, terrorists say.
This insane policy does have a silver lining. It just might encourage terrorists in Yemen and Afghanistan to surrender. That way they can leave the blood and guts battlefield and wage jihad from the worldwide platform being afforded (courtesy of U.S. taxpayers) by a New York courtroom. Again, courtesy of Obama. Who knows, terrorists might just be able to accomplish more effective jihad from within America. Just think of the recruitment opportunities in American jails. Yahoo!
Then again, these animals may just opt to stay on the battlefield overseas. After all, Obama's new rules of engagement have severely hampered U.S. fighting men. All al Qaeda has to do is hide behind women and children and they get a virtual free pass. And if by chance they get caught killing Americans and they aren't mirandized, well, its off to Gitmo, where they'll have a chance to rest up and regroup. Once they gain 20 pounds or so, they'll be shipped back home where they pick up right where they left off.
Unless, of course, Obama is successful in closing Gitmo, in which case the terrorists will have to make do with 3 squares and cable TV from Chicago until they get shipped home to the same old goat meat and drafty caves.
No wonder our enemies are laughing. As the Taliban indoctrinate kids as young as five years-old into being killing machines, Obama focuses his efforts on sanitizing and avoiding a fight to the finish that our enemies wage as a war and Obama wages as an exercise in rhetoric.
As the left steps up their efforts to sensitize males, our enemies breed warriors and come ever closer to obtaining the technology and materials needed for a nuclear weapon. America will then have no choice but to follow Obama's policy of appeasement. And the terrorists will have won. And America will be no more.
If you're not scared yet, let me offer you this visual exercise: Imagine Obama and his buddies coming face to face with a coven of jihadists. Which side is going to win? Obama's words or the terrorist's sword?
Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina
Tags: Obama, on, surrender, terror, war
Views: 77
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Slayer Dug on
-
You got a better way than personally attacking one who has the temerity to speak their mind, whether or not you agree with what they have to say? The Democrats are just as much to blame as The Republicans for the mess this country is in. As I have stated numerous times, it is the fault of the legislative and judicial branches of this government for allowing the President and Vice-President abuse EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE and for allowing our government to be bought wholesale by the university-industrial-military complex that influences the decision making of our domestic and foreign policies.
-
Permalink Reply by Westerly_2 on
-
This, I can agree with. We're in this together. But, please, no "cumbaya." Most of us have thrown away our headbands and sappy ditties. These ideas make sense and deserve to be debated. Thank you.
-
Permalink Reply by Mother Sanity (JackieRodzinski) on
-
better yet, why dont we blow the rest of the world to kingdom come. Think of all that extra space, all those groovy resources.
-
Permalink Reply by Bull on
-
"the Obama administration decided to close down our embassy in Yemen."
The U.S. embassy in Yemen said it reopened after a raid that killed two al Qaeda militants dealt with specific security concerns which had forced U.S. and European missions to close.
Thought you might enjoy some facts
-
Permalink Reply by Nancy Morgan on
-
Facts? Fact is, the embassy was closed. OK, it reopened, but that doesn't mean it didn't close. That is a fact. Hellooooo
-
Permalink Reply by CWO3ROBBIE on
-
Nancy, Anyone who read what you wrote would have believed that you ment the embassy had closed period. The tone of your writing leads one to believe that the Embasy was closed at the time of your writing. In this particular article as in many of your writings you state something accurate, then proceed to warp it to make a point with your believers and infuriate those that disagree with you to the point that they make illogical emotional statements. This is a great tactic. Rush has developed it to the point that it is an art form. I used to listen to rush back in the late 80s. I thought he had some really good points. Then one day I realized, he just led me to a conclusion that the fact he had presented did not justify. The longer Ilistened to him the more I realized that at least 80% of his presintations fell into that category. Then when someone points out one of your misstatements you try to use ridicule throw up a smoke screen. See your above post as of January 5 2010 at 10:06 am.
-
-
You're absolutely right. Complaining is easy, offering a solution is harder. Here's my solution: Fight a war on terror instead of a war of words.
-
-
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091230/pl_politico/31049
..Obama takes the heat Bush did not
Josh Gerstein Josh Gerstein – Tue Dec 29, 10:33 pm ET
Eight years ago, a terrorist bomber’s attempt to blow up a transatlantic airliner was thwarted by a group of passengers, an incident that revealed some gaping holes in airline security just a few months after the attacks of Sept. 11. But it was six days before President George W. Bush, then on vacation, made any public remarks about the so-called shoe bomber, Richard Reid, and there were virtually no complaints from the press or any opposition Democrats that his response was sluggish or inadequate.
That stands in sharp contrast to the withering criticism President Barack Obama has received from Republicans and some in the press for his reaction to Friday’s incident on a Northwest Airlines flight heading for Detroit.
-
-
How do I know that you watch CNN?:)
-
-
""As the left steps up their efforts to sensitize males, our enemies breed warriors and come ever closer to obtaining the technology and materials needed for a nuclear weapon. America will then have no choice but to follow Obama's policy of appeasement. And the terrorists will have won. And America will be no more."
Sensitize? Good luck with circumventing 400 years of American culturization with only a fraction of the time the dems were elected to serve. So progressive liberals can really eradicate facial hair, lowere adrenaline levels and re-distribute muscle tissue with the stroke of a pen? "And America will be no more"? Fascinating.
-
Permalink Reply by blondie 11 on
-
Oh Nancy, you posted this at just the right place. Have a great day.(smile)
-
-
That's not what I said. Helloooo....
© 2024 Created by Aggie.
Powered by
