TBD on Ning
Mighty oil-eating microbes help clean up the Gulf
Wed Jul 28, 4:41 pm ET
By JOHN CAREY, environmental writer
Where is all the oil? Nearly two weeks after BP finally capped the biggest oil spill in U.S. history, the oil slicks that once spread across thousands of miles of the Gulf of Mexico have largely disappeared. Nor has much oil washed up on the sandy beaches and marshes along the Louisiana coast. And the small cleanup army in the Gulf has only managed to skim up a tiny fraction of the millions of gallons of oil spilled in the 100 days since the Deepwater Horizon rig went up in flames.
So where did the oil go? "Some of the oil evaporates," explains Edward Bouwer, professor of environmental engineering at Johns Hopkins University. That’s especially true for the more toxic components of oil, which tend to be very volatile, he says. Jeffrey W. Short, a scientist with the environmental group Oceana, told the New York Times that as much as 40 percent of the oil might have evaporated when it reached the surface. High winds from two recent storms may have speeded the evaporation process.
[Photos: Latest from the Gulf oil spill]
[Related: 100 days of oil: Gulf life changed for good]
Although there were more than 4,000 boats involved in the skimming operations, those cleanup crews may have only picked up a small percentage of the oil so far. That’s not unusual; in previous oil spills, crews could only scoop up a small amount of oil. "It’s very unusual to get more than 1 or 2 percent," says Cornell University ecologist Richard Howarth, who worked on the Exxon Valdez spill. Skimming operations will continue in the Gulf for several weeks.
Some of the oil has sunk into the sediments on the ocean floor. Researchers say that’s where the spill could do the most damage. But according to a report in Wednesday’s New York Times, "federal scientists [have determined] the oil [is] primarily sitting in the water column and not on the sea floor."
Perhaps the most important cause of the oil’s disappearance, some researchers suspect, is that the oil has been devoured by microbes. The lesson from past spills is that the lion’s share of the cleanup work is done by nature in the form of oil-eating bacteria and fungi. The microbes break down the hydrocarbons in oil to use as fuel to grow and reproduce. A bit of oil in the water is like a feeding frenzy, causing microbial populations to grow exponentially.
Typically, there are enough microbes in the ocean to consume half of any oil spilled in a month or two, says Howarth. Such microbes have been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic to Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.
Microbes grow faster in the warmer water of the Gulf than they do in, say, the cool waters off Alaska, where the Exxon Valdez spill occurred. Moreover, the Gulf is hardly pristine. Even before humans started drilling for oil in the Gulf — and spilling lots of it — oil naturally seeped into the water. As a result, the Gulf evolved a rich collection of petroleum-loving microbes, ready to pounce on any new spill. The microbes are clever and tough, observes Samantha Joye, microbial geochemist at the University of Georgia. Joye has shown that oxygen levels in parts of the Gulf contaminated with oil have dropped. Since microbes need oxygen to eat the petroleum, that’s evidence that the microbes are hard at work.
The controversial dispersant used to break up the oil as it gushed from the deep-sea well may have helped the microbes do their work. Microbes can more easily consume small drops of oil than big ones. And there is evidence the microbes like to munch on the dispersant as well.
It is still far too early to know how much damage the spill has done — and may still be doing — to the environment. Tar balls continue to wash up on beaches. And the risk of a leak remains, until the well is permanently capped sometime in the next few weeks.
(story from my yahoo page at the link below)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews_excl/ynews_excl_sc3270
By JOHN CAREY, environmental writer
Where is all the oil? Nearly two weeks after BP finally capped the biggest oil spill in U.S. history, the oil slicks that once spread across thousands of miles of the Gulf of Mexico have largely disappeared. Nor has much oil washed up on the sandy beaches and marshes along the Louisiana coast. And the small cleanup army in the Gulf has only managed to skim up a tiny fraction of the millions of gallons of oil spilled in the 100 days since the Deepwater Horizon rig went up in flames.
So where did the oil go? "Some of the oil evaporates," explains Edward Bouwer, professor of environmental engineering at Johns Hopkins University. That’s especially true for the more toxic components of oil, which tend to be very volatile, he says. Jeffrey W. Short, a scientist with the environmental group Oceana, told the New York Times that as much as 40 percent of the oil might have evaporated when it reached the surface. High winds from two recent storms may have speeded the evaporation process.
[Photos: Latest from the Gulf oil spill]
[Related: 100 days of oil: Gulf life changed for good]
Although there were more than 4,000 boats involved in the skimming operations, those cleanup crews may have only picked up a small percentage of the oil so far. That’s not unusual; in previous oil spills, crews could only scoop up a small amount of oil. "It’s very unusual to get more than 1 or 2 percent," says Cornell University ecologist Richard Howarth, who worked on the Exxon Valdez spill. Skimming operations will continue in the Gulf for several weeks.
Some of the oil has sunk into the sediments on the ocean floor. Researchers say that’s where the spill could do the most damage. But according to a report in Wednesday’s New York Times, "federal scientists [have determined] the oil [is] primarily sitting in the water column and not on the sea floor."
Perhaps the most important cause of the oil’s disappearance, some researchers suspect, is that the oil has been devoured by microbes. The lesson from past spills is that the lion’s share of the cleanup work is done by nature in the form of oil-eating bacteria and fungi. The microbes break down the hydrocarbons in oil to use as fuel to grow and reproduce. A bit of oil in the water is like a feeding frenzy, causing microbial populations to grow exponentially.
Typically, there are enough microbes in the ocean to consume half of any oil spilled in a month or two, says Howarth. Such microbes have been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic to Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.
Microbes grow faster in the warmer water of the Gulf than they do in, say, the cool waters off Alaska, where the Exxon Valdez spill occurred. Moreover, the Gulf is hardly pristine. Even before humans started drilling for oil in the Gulf — and spilling lots of it — oil naturally seeped into the water. As a result, the Gulf evolved a rich collection of petroleum-loving microbes, ready to pounce on any new spill. The microbes are clever and tough, observes Samantha Joye, microbial geochemist at the University of Georgia. Joye has shown that oxygen levels in parts of the Gulf contaminated with oil have dropped. Since microbes need oxygen to eat the petroleum, that’s evidence that the microbes are hard at work.
The controversial dispersant used to break up the oil as it gushed from the deep-sea well may have helped the microbes do their work. Microbes can more easily consume small drops of oil than big ones. And there is evidence the microbes like to munch on the dispersant as well.
It is still far too early to know how much damage the spill has done — and may still be doing — to the environment. Tar balls continue to wash up on beaches. And the risk of a leak remains, until the well is permanently capped sometime in the next few weeks.
(story from my yahoo page at the link below)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews_excl/ynews_excl_sc3270
Views: 17
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by alienken on
-
Major crisis? They are having trouble finding it.
It's as Rush Limbaugh predicted 2 months ago and he got so much flack for it. The environment is stronger than people think he said the oil is only a problem when it hits the shore....TRUE
If Obama didn't drag his feet on letting the skimmers from foreign countries help, very little would have even made it to the shore.
The media reported that the area would be devestated for 10-20 years. I give it 2 years to be back to normal! -
-
Permalink Reply by Madhatterat60 on
-
when you start quoting a drug addicted gas bag as "gospel" don't be surprised when people with intelligence giggle.
-
-
-
I guess there is always hope for gloom and doom. Keep your fingers crossed. (sarcasm)
-
-
Permalink Reply by Mark Mentzer on
-
I dunno. This seems too good to be true. I think it's probably a pack of lies, based on a possibility of truth, put up by BP lobbyists.
-
-
-
If they were this good at controlling the media, BP would have killed alot more bad publicity and had alot more good news.
Why haven't the environmentalist gone after Obama? It was about day 70 that he allowed the foreign skimmers to start the clean up. Does anyone here recognize that if the skimmers started day one when they volunteered to, the mess on the coast would not be nearly as bad if at all.
Why is Obama getting a pass. I thought the environment was more important than politics. -
-
-
Hold on Pacis,
The Jones Act could have easily been put on hold with the stroke of a pen. It applies to any foreign vessels. The Obama admin finally did after day 70, when the foreign skimmers started the clean up.
Your right it was not a surface spill which made the whole leak problem very complicated. The leak was 1 mile deep but it did come to the surface which is how it made it to the coast. The skimmers, if used earlier could have blocked most of it form getting to shore.
let's look at the "drill baby drill policy" "creating" this situation...false. It was the enviromental policies that limited BP from drilling closer to shore and shallower. Throughout this leak story we constantly heard about how attempts to stop the leak were experimental due to the depth.
There is nothing wrong with off shore drilling. Hundreds of drilling rigs have been operating safely for decades and this is the first disaster. I want to hear more about the investigation on why it blew up. There was regular safety inspections and there are rumors about it failing pressure tests but was given a waiver to continue operation.
A real investigation is needed to see who is responsible for this and when that is determined they should be in BIG trouble- Democrate or Republican. -
© 2024 Created by Aggie.
Powered by
