TBD

TBD on Ning

Yahoo News

Christian Sharia Law in America


The Daily Beast
get-lbdata-from-dom
go-to-slideshow-lightbox
" data-id="0ee6ce1a-bc33-337d-97f1-4b831e81c0b2">Christian Sharia Law in America
.

View photo


Christian Sharia Law in America

The question isn’t: Will conservatives push to enact laws based on the Bible? We are way beyond that.  The real questions are: 1. How many more of these laws do they want to impose? And, 2. What will our nation look like if their crusade is successful to bring America’s laws into agreement with “God’s law”?

To some on the right, America is a “Christian nation”—like Saudi Arabia is a Muslim nation—meaning that our nation’s laws should be based on their religious text. These forces aren’t moved by Thomas Jefferson’s famous letter in which he spoke of the need to create, "a wall of separation between church and state.” Nor will they be swayed by citing Ronald Reagan’s words, "Church and state are, and must remain, separate.”

READ MORE For Christie's Pals, Walmart Pays

Just last week we saw another example of creeping Christian Sharia Law with a bill passed by Kansas’ House of Representatives that would allow people and businesses to deny services to same sex couples if it violated their “religious beliefs.” This proposed law would in essence legally sanction discrimination against gay Americans because same sex marriage is not approved by the Bible.  Similar bills are pending in other State's including Mississippi, Idaho, and Arizona.

And in the past few years, we have seen pro-life Christian groups successfully lobby State legislatures to restrict access to abortions. They have also raised religious, not public policy, objections to the government funding birth control.

READ MORE Senate Set for Tax Plan Showdown

But here’s the alarming thing: These views are no longer the fringe of American politics. They are increasingly become mainstream conservative fare.

We saw that in 2012 when Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum declared his belief that the laws in our country must “comport” with God’s law. Santorum also argued in opposition to marriage equality, that our nation’s values “are based on Biblical truth… And, those truths don’t change just because people’s attitudes may change.”

READ MORE Out, Proud...and Republican

And former Governor Mike Huckabee, who is considering running for president in 2016, proclaimed during his 2008 presidential race that our laws should be in accordance with God’s. In fact, Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister, went as far as to say: “…I believe it’s a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God. And that’s what we need to do is amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards rather than trying to change God’s standards so it lines up with some contemporary view…”

Does Huckabee have a shot at winning in 2016?  Well, recent polls show he’s currently the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination.

READ MORE Spy Chief: We Should've Come Clean

Since we can’t talk the Huckabees and Santorums out of their views, then we should take a look at some of the more concerning passages from the Bible in case they truly mean it when they say our laws should be revised to agree with God’s law:

1. If a woman is found not to be a virgin on her wedding night, “she shall be brought to the door of her father’s house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death.”  Deuteronomy 22:20-21

READ MORE Obama at 42 Percent Approval

2. “Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve.” 1 Timothy 2:10-13.

3. “If a man commits adultery with another man's wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.”    Leviticus 20:10 (Unlikely conservatives will push for this law because with it would mean too many politicians would be put to death.)

READ MORE How Presidents Saved Sports

4. “Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.”  Leviticus 20:9

5. “For six days, work is to be done, but the seventh day shall be your holy day, a day of Sabbath rest to the Lord. Whoever does any work on it is to be put to death.” Exodus 35:2

READ MORE Why Aren’t Bad CEOs Ever Punished?

Sure, some will say Huckabee, Santorum, and their supports don’t want to impose laws based on these extreme verses.  Actually recent history tells us a different story. With each success the right has seen, they have become more embolden and pushed for even more radical laws.

For example, not too long ago mainstream abortion opponents did not object to abortions in the case when a woman was raped. But in light of their recent success in restricting abortions, mainstream conservatives now advocate a stricter version of “God’s law” with no abortion exceptions—meaning that women would be sentenced to carrying a rapist’s child to term.

READ MORE Mount Rushmore Fight Club

In upcoming elections, we need to ask any candidate who cites the Bible as the rationale for their political position specifically how far do they intend to take that. At least then we won’t be surprised when they push to pass laws to silence women or stone women to death who aren’t virgins on their wedding night.


Views: 54

Replies to This Discussion

and you can debate and question medical care and food but god forbid you question defense contracts and contractors...

OD Is Stuck with a Flawed $1.5 Trillion Fighter Jet

The Fiscal Times

On CBS’s “60 Minutes” on Sunday night, national security correspondent David Martin chronicled the seemingly never-ending list of problems with the Pentagon’s next-generation F-35 fight jet, from cost overruns of $160 billion to technical problems that have plagued the plane’s development. 

When asked if the F-35 program, which is expected to cost some $1.5 trillion over the four-decade life of the program, is now under control, the Pentagon’s acquisition chief, Frank Kendall, said, "Yes, it is."

Related:  Iranian Caught Stealing Plans for DOD’s $1.5 Trillion Jet

But that commitment came with a warning.

“Long gone is the time when we're going to pay for mistake after mistake after mistake," said Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, the officer who took control of the F-35 program last year. He added that the planes are necessary, however, to keep pace with the technology being developed by U.S. rivals Russia and China.

 “I don't see any scenario where we are walking back away from this program. We're going to buy a lot of these airplanes,” said Bogdan.

DOD is so far down the F-35 rabbit hole, both in terms of technology and cost -- $400 billion for 2,400 planes -- that it has no choice but to continue with the program. Still, it’s not too far gone to send a message to the plane’s manufacturer, Lockheed Martin.

Related:  Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Jet Punches Back

A report in The Washington Post about DOD’s 2015 fiscal request says the Pentagon needs funds to purchase two of the Navy’s version of the plane, six of the Marines,’ and 26 of the Air Force’s model. It’s a sizable order, but it’s actually eight planes less than the 42 originally expected. 

In the scheme of things, eight fewer jets among an order of 2,400 is not a big drop. But the timing of the leak to the Post, as well as the admonishment to Lockheed on “60 Minutes,” is hard to dismiss as mere coincidence.

Lockheed did not comment on camera on the “60 Minutes” report.

Related: 719 New Problems for the $1.5 Trillion F-35 Fighter

Lockheed and DOD have been squabbling over F-35 problems for years. In October, a DOD Inspector General report found 719 problems with the plane and said “Lockheed's failure to make sure subcontractors' work was not up to snuff.”

and if being able to own and openly carry firearms made you safer, then the safest places in the world would be somalia, the sudan and afghanistan..

Why Mitch McConnell's Tea Party Challenger Has A 'Credibility Problem'

Business Insider

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said that the Republican primary challenger to fellow Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell had his credibility hurt last week, when it was revealed that he had signed a letter showing support for the financial bailout program.

"I think it hurts any individual if it appears as if their responses to issues aren't consistent," Paul said at a campaign stop with McConnell in Kentucky,  as quoted by the Associated Press . "So the fact that at one point he said he was for TARP but now he's against TARP, it does hurt credibility."

Bevin, the former president of an investment firm called Veracity Funds, signed an October 2008 report to investors that heaped praise on TARP as one of the bright spots in the economy. The report said to not "call [TARP] a bailout."

Bevin has built much of his campaign on attacking McConnell and the "establishment" GOP on bailouts. His rhetoric has now been called into question by many Republicans as to whether it was genuine.

In fact, many of the national conservative groups that have endorsed Bevin cited his position against TARP as a major reason for doing so. The Senate Conservatives Fund highlighted his opposition to bailouts in their statement of endorsement.

"Matt Bevin is a true conservative who will fight to stop the massive spending, bailouts, and debt that are destroying our country," the group said in its endorsement statement. The group has previously said that it wants to ban bailouts.

In a blog post coupling its endorsement of Bevin, the grassroots group FreedomWorks compiled McConnell's Top 10 worst votes. No. 4 was his vote for the "Wall Street Bailout." 

"Taxpayers should never have been forced to pay for the reckless lending practices of the big banks," FreedomWorks wrote in the post. "McConnell took credit for being a major part of negotiating the bailout, and called the passage of TARP 'the Senate at its finest.'"  FreedomWorks believes TARP was "unconstitutional."

For his part, Bevin told The Blaze last week that he "didn't actually write the letter."

“I was not the investment guy,” he said. “I never bought and sold the securities. So it would have been inappropriate and probably illegal, frankly, for me to have changed the investing commentary written by the sub-advisor the fund who was responsible for that.”

And f or their part, the national and local Kentucky conservative groups are sticking by Bevin. (FreedomWorks didn't respond to a request for comment.)

The Senate Conservatives Fund cast the Politico piece as a "smear," and called on McConnell to retire.

"Mitch McConnell is trying to smear Matt Bevin because he's terrified of losing the Republican primary. Mitch McConnell voted for the Wall Street bailout and has requested stimulus funds from President Obama at least a dozen times," SCF executive director Matt Hoskins told Business Insider.

"He can't defend his record so he's trying to confuse voters about where his opponent stands. Mitch McConnell is a fraud and Kentucky voters know it. He's going to lose the general election and cost Republicans the majority in the  Senate . It's time for Mitch McConnell to shut down his dishonest attack machine and retire with dignity."

Still, neither Bevin nor the groups have offered an explanation as to why he would sign the letter while actively opposing measures that he was telling investors were a good idea.

Problem, your post also led me to this. Good for you, Abigail.

DEAR ABBY: My husband and I relocated to Florida a little over a year ago and were quickly welcomed into our new neighbors' social whirl. Two couples in the neighborhood are gay -- one male, one female. While they are nice enough, my husband and I did not include them when it was our turn to host because we do not approve of their lifestyle choices. Since then, we have been excluded from neighborhood gatherings, and someone even suggested that we are bigots!

Abby, we moved here from a conservative community where people were pretty much the same. If people were "different," they apparently kept it to themselves. While I understand the phrase "when in Rome," I don't feel we should have to compromise our values just to win the approval of our neighbors. But really, who is the true bigot here? Would you like to weigh in? -- UNHAPPY IN TAMPA

DEAR UNHAPPY: I sure would. The first thing I'd like to say is that regardless of what you were told in your previous community, a person's sexual orientation isn't a "lifestyle choice." Gay people don't choose to be gay; they are born that way. They can't change being gay any more than you can change being heterosexual.

I find it interesting that you are unwilling to reciprocate the hospitality of people who welcomed you and opened their homes to you, and yet you complain because you are receiving similar treatment.

From where I sit, you may have chosen the wrong place to live because it appears you would be happier in a less integrated neighborhood surrounded by people who think the way you do. But if you interact only with people like yourselves, you will have missed a chance for growth, which is what you have been offered here. Please don't blow it.



geee they might be happier if they blow it...at least the wife might be.... i read that this am and thought how can they think they AREN'T bigots? but you notice it didn't stop them from going to their houses....just from being a decent reciprocating host and hostess (maybe it wasn't offensive enough to keep them away from free food and booze). meanwhile, in kansas, the bill rolls along which legalizes discrimination because of sexual orientation because gay and lesbian people OFFEND some people's religious senses and for discrimination to be illegal would violate the religious freedom of those who ARE offended.

Talk about contorted thinking and law making.

gee and greg abbott rolls out the rock and roll show. how bout that? republicans embracing rock and roll and drugs and underage groupie sex while embracing as a brother the ideology of ted nugent who not only bragged about all that but also made threats against the president...and i think that last comment (Nugent: "Greg Abbott and only Greg Abbott will keep Texas free")has an unspoken phrase in it..."for white people with penises and rednecks" showing once again that dinosaurs still roam the earth


Republican draws fire for campaigning with Ted Nugent


AFP
get-lbdata-from-dom
go-to-slideshow-lightbox
" data-id="26cdbe32-c0a6-3cd7-b094-5e37cebd2731">
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott briefs the media on April 18, 2013 in West, Texas
.

View photo


Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott briefs the media on April 18, 2013 in West, Texas (AFP Photo/Frederic J. Brown)

Washington (AFP) - A Republican hopeful for Texas governor drew harsh criticism for hitting the campaign trail Tuesday with Ted Nugent, the controversial rocker who recently described President Barack Obama as a "subhuman mongrel."

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott appeared at two campaign stops with the outspoken gun-loving musician-turned-commentator on the first day of early primary voting in the traditionally Republican state where he faces a surprisingly tough challenge by a rising-star Democrat.

Nugent, who sits on the board of the National Rifle Association, used inflammatory and racially-charged language last month to describe the president.

"I have obviously failed to galvanize and prod if not shame enough Americans to be ever vigilant not to let a Chicago communist-raised, communist-educated, communist-nurtured subhuman mongrel like the ACORN community organizer gangster Barack Hussein Obama to weasel his way into the top office of authority in the United States of America," Nugent told Guns.com.

The state's Democratic Party lambasted Abbott for agreeing to campaign with a man whose comments -- Nugent became subject of an FBI investigation in 2012 when he said he would be "dead or in jail" if Obama got re-elected -- are seen as polarizing and often beyond the pale.

"Texans deserve better than a statewide office holder and candidate running for governor who welcomes Ted Nugent and his repugnant comments," said Texas Democratic Party chairman Gilberto Hinojosa.

Abbott's likely Democratic rival in November's election, Wendy Davis, said Abbott's appearance alongside Nugent was "an insult to every woman," according to KERA News.

Nugent, 65, has a history of demeaning women, from calling them "fat pigs" to branding former secretary of state Hillary Clinton a "worthless bitch."

At a Tuesday appearance with Abbott at a North Texas restaurant, Nugent played it safe, according to the Texas Tribune. "Greg Abbott and only Greg Abbott will keep Texas free," he was quoted as saying.

 Nugent caused a stir when he commented on racial segregation in South Africa to Detroit Free Press magazine.


"Apartheid isn't that cut and dry," Nugent said. "All men are not created equal. The preponderance of South Africa is a different breed of man. I mean that with no disrespect. I say that with great respect. I love them because I'm one of them. They are still people of the earth, but they are different. They still put bones in their noses, they still walk around naked, they wipe their butts with their hands ... These are different people. You give 'em toothpaste, they f---ing eat it ... I hope they don't become civilized. They're way ahead of the game."

Unfortunately, I don’t know where I saw it or who drew it, but a recent political cartoon depicted a space alien phoning his masters from planet earth to say something like, “From what I have observed so far, conquering these idiots should be a breeze.”

i keep wondering why we are searching for signs of intelligent life out there when it is so rare down here as to be nonexistant

by the by, i wonder of abbott has his math correct...that the number of white redneck men with a gun fetish in texas outnumbers the total of women of all colors, brown men, black men and white men with a working intelligence

It may be giving him too much credit to assume that he can count much past three, much less perform mathematical calculations at all.

RSS

Badge

Loading…

© 2025   Created by Aggie.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service