TBD on Ning

If a scandal isn't reported by the media, does that mean it never happened?

For the millions of Americans who don't watch Fox News or listen to talk radio, the answer is a resounding yes.

Last Friday, November 20, evidence came to light that "appears to show a conspiracy to falsify data and suppress academic debate in order to exaggerate the possible threat of man-made global warming." Translation: The global warming movement rests almost entirely on the IPCC's claim to represent the "consensus" of climate science. That entire movement now stands discredited.

In the face of this absolutely shameful and possibly criminal revelation of chicanery, deceit and manipulation of data, the mainstream media has stuck to their decades long policy of ignoring any evidence or opinion that challenges their firm belief that the world is undergoing a climate crisis. A crisis that can only be rectified if all global citizens drastically change their behavior.

Despite these revelations, the AP's science writer continued reporting on the worsening climate non-crisis, "Since the 1997 international accord to fight global warming, climate change has worsened and accelerated — beyond some of the grimmest of warnings made back then." Scary stuff, if it were true.

CNN chimed in, reporting their own shocking headlines: Sea Level Rise Could Cost Port Cities $28 Trillion. Remember, this 'news' story was published after evidence had come to light that credibly challenged the very facts CNN was reporting. Yawn.

Six days after this scandal came to light, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and NBC had yet to make their viewers aware of what is being called "the greatest [scandal] in modern history." A scandal that could derail the whole concept of man-made global warming. And, coincidently, the $129 billion carbon market that rests on this shaky and manipulated data.

Also ignoring this scandal is our very own president, who announced last Wednesday that he will attend the long-anticipated, high-stakes global climate summit in Copenhagen. Obama's climate czar, Carol Browner, announced on the very same day that global warming science is "settled.' No need to even address those pesky e-mails that purport to show differently.

"I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists. These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real," said Ms. Browner. The 2,500 hundred scientists, by the way, are comprised mainly of United Nations bureaucrats who have a vested interest in the massive wealth re-distribution that they suggest as a solution to this non-crisis.

On Thursday, more evidence of climate chicanery came to light - but was again ignored by the media. Gerd Leipold, the outgoing leader of Greenpeace, admitted that his organization's recent claim that the Arctic Ice will disappear by 2030 was "a mistake." Oops.

Also on Thursday, information surfaced that indicates Australia, also, appears to have been tinkering with raw data in order to make "global warming' appear scarier that it really is.

Again, no mention was made in the U.S. media. Oh, CNN did finally acknowledged the issue yesterday by reporting that there was "very little context" in the e-mail evidence. CNN declined to publish any of the damning e-mails and they failed to identify any of those 'leading scientists' whose work has been shown to be a possible fraud.

These 'leading scientists' then continued with business as usual, issuing another dire proclamation, "Tackling climate change will help prevent millions of deaths among people who are alive now and save the world for future generations."

These same scientists then responded to the damning evidence to the contrary in the usual way. By attacking and discrediting the motives of the messenger. "We're facing an effort by special interests who are trying to confuse the public," said Richard Somerville, Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Scripps Institution of Oceanography and a lead author of the UN IPCC Fourth Assessment Report.

As of this writing, Fox News is the only national outlet reporting on this scandal. Website WattsUpWithThat and Canada Free Press appear to be the only media investigating the hacked e-mails that seem to show a decades long conspiracy to fudge climate data and squelch any and all opposing data and scientists.

The 'garbage-in, garbage-out' climate models the IPCC use as a basis to portend the end of life on earth now appear to be false. Global 'leaders' conveniently ignore the burgeoning scandal and continue to insist that unless a massive re-distribution of global wealth is immediately enacted, global warming will threaten every man woman and child on earth.

Americans can disagree on the extent of climate change and even question man's role in it. The issue at hand however, is the fact that the media, whose job is to report facts, has declined to do so. The media, with Fox News as the only exception, have bought onto Dan Rather's "fake but accurate" view of the so-called 'global-warming' crisis.

Father Earth, Algore sums it up best: “This is not a political issue, or a scientific issue or a psychological issue – it’s a moral issue. If anything it’s actually a spiritual issue.” There you have it. If you don't agree with the unscientific 'consensus' than you're a really stupid, bad and immoral person. The left has spoken and the media agrees. Case closed.

Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina

Tags: Al, Gore, climate, crisis, global, globaloney, warming

Views: 49

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Zen, you always seem to take any debate as a personal affront...can you not respect the views of others without getting upset? Can you not step away from a previously held belief for even a second to consider the POSSIBLITY that something you believed MIGHT, JUST MIGHT be wrong?
"Maim Sream" media must have facts and must fact check. Something that seems to be lacking in your essay. You use quoes without atribution. You say you get your information from fox and talk radio, this alone brings you whole piece into question.
If you want to have a disscusssion about climate change lets do it, but bring real science and facts. Not just a piece to boost your blog.
This is why I miss kudos!
Unfortunately, TBD doesn't include all the supporting links I included in this article. I'd tell you where you can access them but then you'd again accuse me of blog promotion. Sigh
You can do it in a discussion like this just not on a blog post.
I still wonder about the Ice Age, I mean 20,000 years ago most of us would be sitting under a sheet of ice several hundred feet thick,and now it's gone. How did that happen? Global warming? It couldn't have been man made, there weren't enough of us around to cause it?
Climate change is natural to the earth. Man made Global Warming is a bunch of CRAP to make governments, large corporations like General Electric, and Al Gore RICH.
Fight Global Warming: Disarm Al Gore
Some of the chat E-Mails alluded to the fact that the Arctic was the only place getting warmer in the last ten years. NASA changed out a bad thermometer in the Arctic.
This whole thing turned political, taxes were raised to confront this man made problem.
The world leaders won’t admit that any mistake was made..
Are these leaders going to lower my electricity rate increase to confront GW?
The answer is hell no.
Need more material huh, Nancy. Good luck to you and happy holiday. I gave at the office.
Respectfully, Blondie - what kind of response is that?
I notice you, (like I mention in the article), respond to any facts by attacking the messenger. When confronted with a reply, you dash off some inane but cute comment, entirely lacking in substance. Aargh
I attack no one, Nancy. You are paid to write material. I write for fun. Just have a great day and use the material you like. I know other people that do just what you do. I do not live a sheltered life, and I am not starting a discussion. Happy Friday!!!!!!




© 2024   Created by Aggie.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service