TBD

TBD on Ning

GOP Lawmaker Says Climate Change Is 'The Greatest Deception In The History Of Mankind'

Posted: 06/30/2014 7:17 pm EDT Updated: 4 hours ago
Print Article

Louisiana state Rep. Lenar Whitney (R) is accusing liberals, such as former Vice President Al Gore, of advancing "the greatest deception in the history of mankind" -- man-made climate change -- in a scheme to empower the executive branch and increase taxes.

“A specter is haunting America,” Whitney, who is running for Congress in Louisiana’s 6th Congressional District, warned in a campaign video released Wednesday. “It is perhaps the greatest deception in the history of mankind.”

Mocking Gore’s 2006 Academy Award–winning climate change documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth,” Whitney claimed that the planet "has done nothing but get colder each year since the film’s release.”

“Quite inconveniently for Al Gore, and for the rest of the politicians who continue to advance this delusion, any 10-year-old can invalidate their thesis with one of the simplest scientific devices known to man: a thermometer,” Whitney said, citing record sea ice in the Antarctic sector.

Numerous GOP lawmakers and climate change contrarians have pointed to below-zero temperatures and seasonal snowfall as evidence against the legitimacy of human-induced climate change, despite numerous scientific reports debunking their claims.

Although many parts of the U.S. witnessed record-low temperatures this past winter, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are still rising, winters have become increasingly warmer over the past century and Arctic sea ice is still melting.

Whitney’s own state is one of the most vulnerable regions in the country to climate change, with rising coastal sea levels estimated to submerge the Louisiana coastline by 2100.

Views: 537

Replies to This Discussion

which proves he is a fucking lizard....i was talking about this kind of stuff the other day with another person. i mentioned that what makes all the discussion moot is that you can refute allegations, accusations and muddled bullshit all day long with facts but the VERY SAME PEOPLE come back the next day, if not sooner, with the same old horseshit about 'phony birth certificates', all democrats are socialists or communists. the fema concentration camps and on and on...maybe that kind of talk is ginned up to deflect attention from the recent history we have had to endure vis-a-vis iraq, afghanistan, the financial meltdown, nonbid contracts, political district gerrymandering, corporations are persons too, 'helping and watching out for women' by passing legislation that closes down clinics, helping the poor by cutting budgets and giving tax breaks to people like mitt romney

it just gets better and better...TWIT TV...100 bucks a year to watch palin....how much extra for no sound?


Sarah Palin launches online subscription channel


Associated Press
Sarah Palin, then a Sportsman Channel host
.

View photo


Sarah Palin, then a Sportsman Channel host during the 2014 Winter Television Critics Association tour at the Langham Hotel on January 10, 2014 in Pasadena, California. (Photo by Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images)

NEW YORK (AP) — Sarah Palin has started her own subscription-based online network.

The Sarah Palin Channel, which went live on Sunday, bills itself as a "direct connection" for the former Alaska governor and GOP vice presidential candidate with her supporters, with "no need to please the powers-that-be," Palin says in a video mission statement on her channel's home page.

"Are you tired of the media filters?" she asks. "Well, I am. I always have been. So we're gonna do something about it."

"We'll talk about the issues that the mainstream media won't talk about," she adds.

Palin says she oversees all content posted to the channel. This will include her own political commentary. Other features for subscribers include the ability to submit questions to Palin and participate with her in online video chats.

Membership is set at $9.95 per month or $99.95 for a year.

Palin remains active elsewhere as a Fox News Channel contributor and reality-TV personality.

The Sarah Palin Channel is part of the TAPP video platform, which launched earlier this year.

Where do I sign up? NOT!!!

Fox Panel Trashes Republicans On Border Crisis

Posted: 07/27/2014 11:21 am EDT Updated: 07/28/2014 11:59 am EDT

WASHINGTON -- A Fox panel on Sunday strongly criticized Republicans for resisting immigration reform and calling to quickly deport thousands of children who are currently in U.S. custody after fleeing violence in Central America.

During a segment on "Fox News Sunday," host Chris Wallace pressed the panel, made up of USA Today columnist Kirsten Powers, Conservative Washington Post columnist George Will and Fox News' Brit Hume and Juan Williams, about who should take the blame for the current border crisis and what could be done to resolve it. Powers said that Obama had changed his position on whether a 2008 law offering immigration hearings to undocumented children should be altered, but she had scathing words for the GOP.

"The Republicans don't really seem to want to work on immigration until it comes to deporting children," Powers said. "This is the only thing they really have been willing to do at this point, is just to say, 'We'll pass the bill to deport children, but we won't talk about any sort of broader comprehensive immigration issue.'"

Will agreed.

"I think Kirsten is largely right. My view is that we have to say to the children, 'Welcome to America. You're going to go to school and get a job and become Americans.' We have 3,141 counties in this country. That would be 20 per county. The idea that we can't assimilate these 8-year-old criminals with their teddy bears is preposterous. "

"These young people are a social group of people who are being threatened by the gangs and whose lives are at stake," Fox contributor Juan Williams added. "Even young evangelicals this week, in writing to Congress, said, 'You must consider these children as children and give them due process.'"

These kids manage to escape the concentration camps and our "Pro'Life" Party will send them back gladly...

and here's a sarah palin wannabe....do they clone them to get them this fucking stupid? and add to that the inevitable bleating about being a victim when someone questions them about anything...

Louisiana Republican Flees Interview When Asked About Obama's Birthplace

Business Insider

A Republican congressional candidate fled her interview with a major election-forecasting group after being asked why she believed global warming was a hoax and whether President Barack Obama was born in the United States, according to a new report in The Washington Post.

In the Post, David Wasserman, the House editor at the Cook Political Report, detailed his strange encounter with the "frightening" and "fact-averse" Louisiana State Rep. Lenar Whitney.

Whitney, who is running for Louisiana's open sixth district, gained some prominence in June when she released a campaign video blasting global warming as a "hoax" and the press as "lamestream media." Wasserman said he pressed Whitney on the issue of climate change only to find her unable to answer his questions.

"But it’s not unreasonable to expect candidates to explain how they arrived at their positions, and when I pressed Whitney repeatedly for the source of her claim that the earth is getting colder, she froze and was unable to cite a single scientist, journal, or news source to back up her beliefs," he wrote.

Wasserman said he attempted to "change the subject" and ask whether she believed Obama was born in the United States. Her aides then ended the interview.

"When she replied that it was a matter of some controversy, her two campaign consultants quickly whisked her out of the room, accusing me of conducting a 'Palin-style interview,'" he continued. "It was the first time in hundreds of Cook Political Report meetings that a candidate has fled the room."

Whitney could not immediately be reached for comment.

Update (10:10 a.m.): In a Facebook post last week, after the interview was conducted, Whitney slammed the Cook Political Report. "It was obvious, from the onset of the interview, that Wasserman had planned to jump me simply because I am a Conservative Woman and liberal shills like Dave Wasserman want to destroy us," she wrote.

Yeah, liberal shills are dogging Christians too.

Her answer was easy, she gets everything from Fox, Rush, Glen Beckywhackystan, etc.

suuuuuuuure they believe in democracy but only as long as they win....

  • 2014 Watch    August 6 
Mississippi GOP chairman tells Chris McDaniel: No, I won't just make you the winner of the Senate primary
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The Mississippi Republican Party announced Wednesday night that it will not hear Tea Party–aligned Senate candidate Chris McDaniel's effort to overturn the narrow victory of Sen. Thad Cochran in the June 24 Republican primary runoff. The Clarion-Ledger reports that state GOP chairman Joe Nosef is telling McDaniel's campaign that they would have to pursue a different remedy: Going to court.

McDaniel on Monday officially sent the state Republican Party executive committee his formal election challenge, in which he asked them to officially declare him the winner by about 25,000 votes, throwing out the 7,000-vote win by incumbent Cochran. Among other things, McDaniel has charged that Cochran's campaign strategy — reaching out to the (usually Democratic) African-American community to cross over into the Republican primary — had fraudulently overturned the will of genuine Republican voters.

As Nosef explained in his response letter to McDaniel's attorney, state law would require a legal contest to be filed within 10 days of the party challenge — a deadline of August 14; but the state GOP's own bylaws require a notice of seven days before an executive meeting — which would mean that even if he had called a meeting today, it couldn't be held until August 13.

"Obviously, it is not possible for our committee of 52 volunteers to attempt to engage in such an exercise in a prudent manner in one day," wrote Nosef, with both the underline and bolding in the original. "In fact, given the extraordinary relief requested of overturning a United States Senate primary in which over 360,000 Mississippians cast votes, the only way to ensure the integrity of the election process and provide a prudent review of this matter is in a court of law. The public judicial process will protect the rights of the voters as well as both candidates, and a proper decision will be made on behalf of our party and our state."

- - Eric Kleefeld

63 Texas Republicans Sign Court Brief Saying Marriage Equality Could Lead To Legal Incest, Pedophilia

Posted: 08/06/2014 2:43 pm EDT Updated: 08/06/2014 2:59 pm EDT
Print Article
SENATOR DAN PATRICK TEXAS

In support of Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott’s efforts to reinstate the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, more than 60 Texas lawmakers signed an amicus brief Monday arguing that recognition of gay marriage could lead to the legalization of incest, pedophilia and polygamy.

Filed with the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, 63 members of the Texas Conservative Coalition, the state legislature’s conservative caucus, advanced the notion that legalizing same-sex marriage could provide legal justification for the recognition of various moral taboos, including incest and pedophilia.

“The district court broadened the definition of the ‘existing right to marry’ as one that includes the right of people to ‘select the partners of their choosing’ for marriage, without regard to sex,” the brief contends. “If the right to select ‘partners of their choosing’ is the criterion used to invoke marriage as a fundamental right, then marriage restrictions on age, polygamy, and consanguinity are also ripe for challenge.”

As first reported by Lone Star Q, signatories include the GOP nominee for lieutenant governor, state Sen. Dan Patrick, Texas House Speaker Pro Tempore Dennis Bonnen (R) and state Sen. Ken Paxton, the Republican nominee for attorney general.

To view the full list of the 63 lawmakers who signed the brief, see here.

“Another ground cited by supporters of Texas’s marriage laws and subsequently dismissed by the district court is that recognition of same-sex marriage ‘could lead to the recognition of bigamy, incest, pedophilia, and group marriage,’” the brief continued. “As already discussed in this brief, restrictions on marriage relating to these moral considerations remain valid. Thus, the goal of actively trying to prevent those practices from becoming valid is entirely rational public policy."

While the Republican lawmakers concede that “recognition of pedophilia or other morally reprehensible actions” may not actually be the “logical next step” following marriage equality, they maintain that legislators enacted Texas’ marriage laws "with the intention of supporting marriage arrangements that they believe support valid goals related to those concerns.”

The friend-of-court brief comes one week after Abbott’s office filed an appellants brief urging the appeals court to reverse U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia’s February decision, which deemed the state's same-sex marriage ban in violation of the 14th Amendment’s due-process and equal-protection clauses.

"Texas’ current marriage laws deny homosexual couples the right to marry, and in doing so, demean their dignity for no legitimate reason," Garcia wrote in the DeLeon v. Perry decision, which has been stayed pending Abbot’s appeal.

In a 42-page appeal, Abbott argued that the state’s same-sex marriage ban promotes "stable, lasting relationships" for child-rearing and insisted that the issue be decided by voters and state lawmakers instead of the courts.

“Texas’s marriage laws are rooted in a basic reality of human life: procreation requires a male and a female. Two people of the same sex cannot, by themselves, procreate,” Abbott's brief, which is also backed by the Texas Roman Catholic Bishops and the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops, states. “The State’s recognition and encouragement of opposite-sex marriages increases the likelihood that naturally procreative couples will produce children, and that they will do so in the context of stable, lasting relationships.”

Echoing the state's reasoning, Monday’s brief from the Texas Conservative Coalition argued that defining marriage exclusively between one man and one woman “gives women and children the surest protection against poverty and abuse,” and “provides for healthy psychological development of children.”

“There is a wide range of literature supporting this view, particularly with regard to child development, making it plausible and, thus, rational for legislators to believe,” the brief continues, citing widely debunked research from Mark Regnerus.

While 19 states and the District of Columbia have legalized same-sex marriage, Midwest states are facing a litany of lawsuits from same-sex couples seeking marriage rights. Nationwide, more than 75 lawsuits challenging bans on same-sex unions are pending in 32 states.

Since December, courts across the country have ruled in favor of marriage equality in 29 cases, all of which are now on appeal.

(h/t Lone Star Q)

Such wrong, even retarded, theories are ridiculous, they disgust me.

abbott is the same person who, as a judge, determined that in his view, a company does not have an obligation to do background checks or any other action before hiring employees and sending them to customers' homes. the case came about because the kirby vacuum cleaner company sent a door to door salesman out who raped and beat a housewife. turns out he had done that sort of thing before but hey, it wasn't THEIR fault

It never is, is it?

RSS

Badge

Loading…

© 2024   Created by Aggie.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service