Well - actually It seems at present only two. Or three . One is quite adamant
and the other is unhappy about my dictate, he finds it discriminatory. The third is ranting that we have a right to our group because we have been so downtrodden - mind he is not happy about us - but we poor gals have a right because of what we have all gone through to (possibly) have our own space. He suggested that we are "male bashing".
In Guys & Gal Connecting
two men have made it quite clear that they are not at all happy with being excluded from participating in our group, citing the bromides that if the roles were in reverse we would be upset about being excluded and well - you can read the words of Peter James and the concern by Apposite at your leisure. Click on the Peter James profile and you will see yet the third voice of Tim Elston whom I mentioned who is protesting in Peter's comment box. It is he who cites "male bashing".
If it is not visible - I have it to post as I've a copy of the men's comments for Mr. James.
Shall we invite men to comment - or not. If so why ? If not - why?
Let us be clear about where we all stand on this issue. I will bow to the majority - which must constitute 15% of the active membership which will constitute a quorum. Yes
: We permit men to join and comment at will within this groupNo: We do not permit men to join and comment within this group
Thank you everyone. This poll now closed. It's unanimous. The group continues ~
For Women Only!