"Pay no attention to those fakes behind the curtain."

[Vernon Windsor]

Rachel Maddow, once again,pulls back the curtain on the honesty-challenged Republicans over their claims about budget deficits and what they are doing about it. Check it out here.

 

Is anyone surprised?

[Lawrence Bates]

Rachel Maddow IS one of your fakes behind the curtain.  Neither she nor you, are fooling anyone.

[Vernon Windsor]

Allergic to facts Lawrence? Too bad, so sad.

[Lawrence Bates]

Allergic to facts Lawrence? Too bad, so sad.

 

You guys think that's a question?  That says volumes about your ability to hold up one end of a discussion.  Combine that with the fact that you'r still blaming everything on Bush and you have the reason that your site here is dying.

Presidents under our form of government don't pass budgets.  Legislators do.   If you recall both houses of congress were controlled by the Democrats during Bushes last term in office and also right up until the first of  this year.  To continue with the "it's all Bushes fault" retoric is just as lame as the mouthing of platitudes like "Electorate not fooled by "conservative" spending".

Grab your knee with both hands, if necessary to keep it from jerking, and argue from facts instead of your liberal mind training.

[Lawrence Bates]

Bullshit.

When Bush, the allegedly reformed drug abuser/alcoholic, took office, the Senate was split 50-50. The Prince of darkness insured GOP control.

The GOP controlled both the House and Senate until 2007.

The composition of the 110th Congress (2007) was as follows:

Senate: 49 Democrats, 49 Republicans House: 233 Democrats, 198 Republicans

 

The composition of the 110^th Senate was hardly 50-50, since it included 2 independents,  who were caucusing with the Democrats, giving the Democrats control of the Senate also, at 51 to 49.   Of course you just forgot that fact. 

The 111^th Congress operated with anywhere from 55-58 Democratic senators added to those 2 Independents, opposed to from 39-42 Republican Senators.  The House was 253-257 Democrats lined up against from 176-180 Republican representatives.  Still a recipe for socialism.

When Obama, (the self admitted drug abuser and alcoholic), assumed office, both houses had been in the control of the Democrats for long enough to have begun laying the groundwork for the Socialist takeover of the United States.   When he and they combined their ill will for America, what they hoped would be the first in a long scheduled timetable of Socialism trains left Freedom Station, and I do mean left.  

 Alas for the far left, though, Mr. and Mrs. Voter-taxpayer, had had enough of that foolishness and said so at the polls, resulting just for a start in a comfortable margin of control in the 112^th  House of Representatives where the money that government loves to spend, comes from.

 On the morning of November the 7^th 2012,  I expect we will be seeing the same thing in the Senate.  At present in the 112^th Senate, counting  the 2 Independents  still not particular who they caucus with, the liberal left are 6 votes up on their Republican counterparts.   That’s not to say that there are no liberal leftists passing themselves off as Republicans you understand, but we do have a plan for that.

 

Stop regurgitating the crap your favorite hate group feeds you.

 

Unlike yourself (to pac), I don’t have dealings with hate groups.  My statement, my definitions so don’t bother.

 

As far as the site dying, you think yours is doing better? If it's dead, why do you bother?

 

I don’t have a group, I visit several, but I feel a duty to check in here once in a while to assure myself that my old friend pac hasn’t succumbed to apoplexy.

[Vernon Windsor]

Ad hominem attacks, Lawrence? Really? Tsk, tsk.

[Lawrence Bates]

Ad hominem attacks, Lawrence? Really? Tsk, tsk.

 

Where do you see any such thing in my post, Vernon?   If you're referencing my answer to pac's comment re: hate groups, why would you see that as an ad hominem attack, but not so his original  comment to me on hate groups?  Not very logical, almost a double standard oh........ yeah.  Forgot where I was for a moment.

[Vernon Windsor]

Look above. Neither I nor my original post mentioned president Bush. You did. Yet you accuse me of knee jerk response?!?

The post presents facts. You just don't like them. Because of that (I assume) you discount anything I present as "liberal mind training." Further you accuse me of "being unable to hold up one end of a discussion." That seems like an ad hominem attack to me. It also presupposes that I want to discuss anything with you. I'm not particularly inclined, given your past history.

Lastly, you didn't forget where you were, even for a moment, but you probably did forget that you came here of your volition and can leave anytime you choose.

[Vernon Windsor]

Electorate not fooled by "conservative" spending.

[no1toolmkr]

The Government needs to be shut down and re-evaluated...

[Lawrence Bates]

Yep, what he said!