TBD

TBD on Ning

Is It Ok For Foreigners To Buy Citizenship From Our Country ?

Record numbers of applicants
In fiscal year 2014, the government received 10,928 applications for EB-5 visas from foreign investors, more than the total available in a year. That’s almost 10 times as many as in 2008, when 1,258 foreign investors applied to the program.

In 2005, just 332 foreign investors applied for visas under the program.

Her story sounds typical of Charlotte’s apartment boom: Developer Jane Wu wants to build a new, high-end complex adjacent to the Lynx Blue Line extension.

What’s more unusual is her source of funding: Chinese investors hoping to secure a green card in exchange for $500,000.

The little-known federal program that provides visas to wealthy foreign investors is perfectly legal, and experts say interest in such visas is surging. The government issues foreigners 10,000 such visas a year, in return for their investments in U.S. projects.

The visas secure permanent residency for the foreign investors and a path to citizenship for them, their spouses and minor children.

But opponents say the program amounts to selling U.S. citizenship, allowing the well-to-do to jump to the head of the line in exchange for a fee. And a federal watchdog found the program, known as EB-5, is poorly monitored, and that it’s hard to tell whether it generates the economic benefits supporters claim.

Congress created the program in 1990 to stimulate the U.S. economy with more foreign investment. Supporters say it creates jobs for American workers, while offering developers access to a cheaper source of capital than traditional financing.

The program grew sharply after the last recession, when traditional loans were harder to come by, and has now hit record levels.

“It boosts the economy and creates jobs,” Wu said.

At a time when disputes over immigration policy have convulsed Washington and paralyzed Congress, the investor visa program has operated with little scrutiny. Critics say that’s because of the relatively small number of visas involved compared with the millions of immigrants in the country illegally and hundreds of thousands more on waiting lists.

“What EB-5 amounts to is selling green cards,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that calls for stricter immigration limits. “I just don’t think that in the list of criteria that we might use to pick foreigners we should include people who have half a million dollars to spare.”

There also have been well-publicized boondoggles. In the biggest EB-5 bust, Anshoo Sethi, the promoter of a hotel and convention center project in Chicago, was indicted last year following a federal investigation. Sethi was charged with fraud after taking $160 million worth of Chinese investors’ money for the complex, which was never built. The government returned $147 million to the investors but alleged Sethi misappropriated much of the rest.

And on Thursday, a commission created by Congress to monitor U.S.-China economic interactions reported that exploding demand for EB-5 visas has overwhelmed the program and outpaced regulators’ ability to oversee it.

Record number of applications

The number of immigrants applying for EB-5 visas has soared to record levels. In the first eight months of last year, 85 percent of EB-5 visas issued were to Chinese citizens, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission found – up from 14 percent in 2007.

Immigration attorneys and developers said Chinese investors are drawn by the chance to gain residency for their children, who can then go to American schools and colleges. And China’s pollution problems and anti-corruption crackdowns have nudged some elites toward the door, according to the commission’s report.

While the immigrants get access to the U.S., developers get a cheaper source of funds. That’s because the immigrant investors don’t demand a high interest rate.

“They’re not looking for these high rates of return,” Jennifer Moseley, an Atlanta-based attorney who practices EB-5 law, said of such investors. “They’re looking for something that is much more stable and will ultimately allow them to get their green card.”

Another indicator of soaring interest in the program is the growth of “regional centers.” Most developers seeking to raise funds from foreigners don’t do so directly. They go through regional centers, entities U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services approves to pool funds from immigrants seeking EB-5 visas.

“When I started in March of 2008 working in the EB-5 world, there were 23 approved regional centers,” Moseley said. “Now, there are about 600. That tells you the interest in it.”

Joining transit-oriented trend

On a site nestled along the Lynx Blue Line extension in the University City area, Wu plans to build an apartment complex with more than 300 upscale units. She plans a second phase on an adjacent site and said details will be available soon.

The site is up for a rezoning hearing in April in front of the Charlotte City Council. Wu said she has a dozen foreign investors approved or near approval and 45 more lined up. She is working through Carolina States Regional Center, which was approved by the federal government last February.

Wu anticipates breaking ground in August or September and finishing in two years. The project would create more than 700 jobs, according to her projections, including construction workers and those who will run the complex once it’s open.

Her project has an estimated cost of about $50 million, Wu said, comparable to similar-sized, high-end projects in South End and near uptown. Money from foreign investors could make up about 65 percent of the financing. She will use traditional financing for the rest.

“We want to build a good project that sets a tone for the area,” Wu said.

City Council member Greg Phipps, whose district includes the area Wu aims to develop, said Wu’s project is the first time he’s seen EB-5 money used in the city.

“It is sort of a unique funding arrangement,” said Phipps, who has met with Wu’s group. “It has the potential to be a really good project, the kind of project we’d like to see near that station.”

Wu first got to know the University City area in 2007 while getting a master’s of science in mathematical finance from UNC Charlotte. She went on to work at Wachovia and then got into real estate. She is also a strategic adviser for Dixon Hughes Goodman’s Chinese investment group and a principal in Panos Hotel group, which develops apartments in the Charlotte area.

Wu said access to EB-5 money makes such projects cheaper. She has maintained family ties to Chengdu, the city in southwest China where she grew up, and said her family’s background in development has helped line up investors.

Wu contended that it’s false to say EB-5 investors are jumping to the head of the immigration line and noted that each visa category has its own total so that EB-5 visas don’t displace other immigrants.

Since EB-5 funds are cheaper than traditional financing, why don’t more developers use them? Wu and other experts said EB-5 funding is often slower than traditional methods.

A trade group for regional centers says U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ processing time for immigrant investors was averaging more than 14 months by the end of fiscal year 2014.

Difficult to track money

Finding out where EB-5 projects are located can be difficult. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services doesn’t track EB-5 projects by state or county, a spokeswoman said. The N.C. Department of Commerce – which helps EB-5 regional centers prepare their applications to the federal government – doesn’t track the projects, either.

All that’s publicly available from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is a list of the approved regional centers, which pool investor money to fund projects. A spokeswoman said detailed records about the regional centers, such as their annual reports, job creation estimates and investor information, are not available to the public. The Observer has filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain access to more detailed information on the regional centers operating in North Carolina.

Many regional centers voluntarily provide detailed information about the projects they’re backing. But others do not or require investors to register and be approved before disclosing what they’re doing. And some developers are wary of discussing projects.

Wu declined to name an EB-5-funded Atlanta apartment project she said she invested in, saying the information was confidential. And Sid Bhatt, who runs a regional center in Charlotte and raises money for EB-5 projects, said he knows of a prominent multifamily developer in Charlotte who has used EB-5 money. He declined to name the developer.

Although the federal immigration service says 57,300 jobs have been created since 1990 and $8.6 billion has been invested, the lack of detailed tracking of projects can make it difficult to assess EB-5 investments’ impact.

“USCIS is unable to demonstrate the benefits of foreign investment into the U.S. economy,” the Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General Office wrote in a December 2013 report. The report said auditors were unable to verify the program’s investment and job creation claims.

Even though foreign money usually comprises just part of a project’s financing, the government counts all jobs created by a project as if they were created by the EB-5 investors.

That situation, the DHS Inspector General Officewrote, “allows foreign investors to take credit for jobs created with U.S. funds, making it impossible for USCIS to determine whether the foreign funds actually created U.S. jobs.”

Despite the criticism, the EB-5 program has gained powerful supporters. The U.S. Conference of Mayors has endorsed the program, and U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, has called it “a powerful job and economic engine.” And the Wall Street Journal reported that a subsidiary of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway is using EB-5 money to help fund a $66 million renovation of an Illinois hotel, while the Related Cos. is using $600 million from Chinese EB-5 investors to help fund its massive Hudson Yards skyscrapers project in Manhattan.

Those supporters say the key is avoiding unscrupulous actors.

Bhatt, also a managing director of investment bank NMS Capital, has been working to raise money for EB-5 projects since 2013, when his Carolina Global Regional Center was approved by the government. He said he and his partner Shashin Patel have helped finance a sawmill in eastern North Carolina and are raising capital for a hotel in Myrtle Beach.

He said regional centers need to carefully vet developers to avoid people who see EB-5 money as a way to chase pipe dreams that a traditional bank wouldn’t finance.

“We don’t want people from the street,” Bhatt said. “We want well-known people who can finish projects.”

Views: 49

Replies to This Discussion

well its no secret that money talks a lot louder so it gets heard .. and who wouldn't want to come to the usa ?? i think some of the key points made in this tho is they don't have any way to decipher just how much money is bein brought in by these fast tracked immigrants for these special projects .. nor is there any trackin for all the projects that have come before and were wildly successful or a terrible disaster .. they make a lot of claims but have no numbers to back any of it up .. how many jobs were created with this eb-5 money ?? nobody knows ..they do throw a lot of numbers around but nobody can verify any of them .. far as i can see its just a way to justify all the visa's they're givin out without any real backlash .. i'm sure somebody is profitin from all this but it may not be the ones they want us to believe it is .. i guess the best statement is the key is avoidin the bad actors .. and without any substantiated numbers to back up anything they tell us just how do you know who the bad actors are ?? don't get me wrong here tho , the usa has always bent the rules to let the richest and the brightest in ahead of the rest of the throngs and hoards that are just ordinary and i don't see that changin anytime soon .. i'd just like to see if they continue that practice that they put in place some kind of verifiable checks and balances to be sure that we're actually gettin what they claim we are .. as it is now it don't look all that transparent to me ..  

our history with immigration has never been fair ......some groups are favored over others at different periods of time...enthicity...skin color...religion etc... And the politics of the moment determine who is legal or not..silly arguments in my opinion...there are all kinds special programs used to justify who gets in legally or not. People are going to continue to come no matter.
And if there is money to be made...all the better, as long as the right wheels are being greased.

does anyone remember the schemes to sell land in square inches back in the 80s and 90s? there was a marketing gimmick consisting of buying up land and subdividing it into square inches to be sold as individual units. the primary buyers of the heehee hawhaw i own land in colorado or arizona or hawaii were people form other countries and especially china and hong kong. the point was that us law allows a visa for a property owner to enter the country. thus before china had hong kong handed back to them, LOTS of hong kong residents took a trip to the us to visit their property....i would think many never used the return portion of their tickets

 Don't miss out on this deal folks:

Moon Land Available

Since 1980 Over 300 Million Acres Sold

     http://www.lunarland.com/  The ONLY company to possess a legal claim and COPYRIGHT for the sale of celestial land

RSS

Badge

Loading…

© 2024   Created by Aggie.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service